Graham Hancock on history: what the evidence says · JRE #2051
SUBJECT: HISTORY
Not a true/false call. Every claim is logged with its sources; read the exhibits below.
The Indus Valley civilization today in Pakistan wasn't known about until the 1920s. It was found by accident.
What the evidence says 01 / RECORD
The core historical fact is accurate: the Indus Valley (Harappan) civilization was unknown to modern scholarship until the 1920s. Harappa was excavated starting in 1920-1921, and Sir John Marshall publicly announced the discovery of this previously unrecognized Bronze Age urban civilization in September 1924, following work by Indian archaeologists Daya Ram Sahni and Rakhaldas Banerji; a single Indus seal had been noted as early as 1875 but was not connected to a lost civilization at the time. The find was significant because it revealed a major urbanized culture on the Indus floodplain that was not previously known to exist, expanding the known geography of Bronze Age civilization to a scale comparable to Mesopotamia and Egypt. However, what was uncovered was a Bronze Age society with writing, urban planning, and trade networks consistent with other early civilizations of that era, not evidence of an anomalously advanced or technologically sophisticated prehistoric global culture. Using this episode to argue that a currently undiscovered advanced global civilization could exist today is a non-sequitur: the Indus discovery shows that the extent and location of known ancient civilizations could still expand via archaeology, not that the technological ceiling of prehistory itself has been underestimated. The specific factual premise of the claim is well-supported, but its use as evidence for a broader unproven hypothesis is not.
Evidence sources 03 / EXHIBITS
- Mohenjo-daro DatingTier 1