Lance Armstrong on doping: what the evidence says · JRE #737
SUBJECT: DOPING
Not a true/false call. Every claim is logged with its sources; read the exhibits below.
But I can't take, when I hear that this program or this particular athlete being me was the greatest fraud in the history of sport, you know, I can't. That's just not true, right?
What the evidence says 01 / RECORD
In October 2012, the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency released its "Reasoned Decision," a report exceeding 1,000 pages with sworn testimony from 26 witnesses, including 11 former teammates, detailing a team-wide doping conspiracy on the U.S. Postal Service cycling team led by Armstrong. USADA CEO Travis Tygart said at the time that "the evidence shows beyond any doubt that the US Postal Service Pro Cycling Team ran the most sophisticated, professionalized and successful doping program that sport has ever seen" -- a description of the team's program, not a verbatim label on Armstrong as an individual, though it was widely repeated in media as branding the scheme the "greatest fraud" in sports history. The UCI accepted USADA's findings without appeal, stripping Armstrong of his seven Tour de France titles and imposing a lifetime ban, and in January 2013 Armstrong publicly admitted to using EPO, blood doping, and other banned substances throughout his career, including during all seven of those wins. Armstrong's denial that the "greatest fraud" label is accurate targets a subjective media paraphrase that cannot be empirically proven or disproven, but the scale, duration, and organized nature of the scheme he has since admitted to are consistent with the severity of USADA's own characterization, making his blanket denial a minimization of an established, admitted doping conspiracy rather than a factual rebuttal.