Robert Malone on vaccine: what the evidence says · JRE #1757
SUBJECT: VACCINE
Not a true/false call. Every claim is logged with its sources; read the exhibits below.
It goes to the ovary at a very high rate, like 11% of the lipids. Now, this wasn't supposed to happen. It was supposed to stay in the arm where it got jabbed, but it doesn't
What the evidence says 01 / RECORD
Pfizer's non-clinical biodistribution study (a rat study using radiolabeled lipid nanoparticles, reproduced in the EMA's Comirnaty assessment report) found that over 48 hours the injection site and liver were the major sites of distribution, with the liver receiving up to 21.5% of the injected dose outside the injection site; the ovaries received substantially less, at a maximum of approximately 0.1% of the injected dose, similar to or lower than the spleen (up to 1.1%) and adrenal glands (up to 0.1%). No vaccine-related macroscopic or microscopic findings were observed in the ovaries in repeat-dose toxicity studies, and no effects on fertility were identified in the developmental and reproductive toxicity (DART) study. The 11% figure cited does not match the percentages reported in the underlying study and appears to misstate the data; the actual ovarian concentration was roughly two orders of magnitude lower than the figure claimed. Current evidence from this study does not support a demonstrated link between vaccination and fertility harm.